Anuncio de adjudicación Servicios
Comparative study on best practices for a stronger EU sanction enforcement
Anuncio publicado en inglés. El análisis con IA se lo resume en su idioma.
- Comprador público
- European Commission, DG FISMA - Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union
Brussels - Lugar de ejecución
- 1000 Brussels
no publicado: dirección del comprador - Valor estimado
- 500.000 € sin IVA
- Importe adjudicado
- 427.948 € sin IVA
- Fin previsto del contrato
- 25 de mayo de 2027
nueva licitación probable hacia noviembre 2026 - Ofertas recibidas
- 14
- Procedimiento
- Procedimiento abierto
Cualquier empresa puede presentar una oferta. - Publicación
- 21 de enero de 2026
- Idioma del anuncio
- Inglés
Análisis IA: ¿presentarse o no?
Resumen en español, criterios, documentos que deben aportarse y veredicto GO / NO GO en un minuto.
Análisis ilimitados durante los 14 días de prueba Pro, sin tarjeta.
Descripción
Restrictive measures (sanctions) are an essential tool for the promotion of the objectives of the Common Foreign and Security Policy. Their objectives include safeguarding the Union’s values, maintaining international peace and security, consolidating and supporting democracy, the rule of law and human rights. The sanctions remain the main instrument in the Union’s toolbox to deter, prevent and condemn aggressive and illiberal behaviour of the third countries.
Considering that the lack of sanction implementation, as well as inconsistencies across different jurisdictions of the Union, also represent a risk to Union financial interests and to the national financial systems, it is important to make sure that the Union sanctions are implemented equally across the Union. This is particularly relevant for the implementation of the Union sanctions against Russia, which have been subsequently adopted starting from 2014. In order to curb circumvention of Union sanctions and assist the Member States in their sanction implementation tasks, this pilot project concerns a study on the best practices and synergies that would benefit the Union’s sanction policy, taking stock of the examples of the United States’ Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the United Kingdom sanctions enforcement authority (OFSI).
This would help to identify similarities, disparities, best practices and missing elements across all the jurisdictions of the Union. Considering that each Member State nominates a very different set and number of national authorities for the enforcement of Union sanctions (currently at least 160 officially designated), it would be useful to see to what extent having a centralised sanction implementation body would benefit Union sanction implementation, as compared to a network of scattered national bodies. Such a study would help to identify a way for reducing ‘avoidable’ sanction evasion, namely in terms of asset freeze and confiscation and visa and travel bans.
Adjudicado a
Códigos CPV
Códigos europeos que clasifican el objeto del contrato. Gracias a ellos encontramos las licitaciones de su oficio.
79311400 73200000 79000000 79300000 79311410
Precios ganadores de contratos comparables
- Un cuarto por debajo de
- 181.800 €
- Mediana
- 293.900 €
- Un cuarto por encima de
- 526.438 €
Importes sin IVA adjudicados en los últimos 3 años para 83 contratos del mismo grupo CPV (7931…), excluidos los acuerdos marco. La mitad de los contratos se sitúa entre los dos cuartiles. Fuente TED: sobre todo contratos por encima de los umbrales europeos, por lo que los importes son más bien elevados.
Contratos similares ya adjudicados
Source : TED – Office des publications de l'Union européenne © Union européenne, données retraitées. Referencia 43276-2026.