Avviso di aggiudicazione Servizi
Comparative study on best practices for a stronger EU sanction enforcement
Bando pubblicato in inglese. L'analisi IA glielo riassume nella sua lingua.
- Acquirente pubblico
- European Commission, DG FISMA - Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union
Brussels - Luogo di esecuzione
- 1000 Brussels
non pubblicato: indirizzo della stazione appaltante - Valore stimato
- 500.000 € IVA esclusa
- Importo aggiudicato
- 427.948 € IVA esclusa
- Fine prevista del contratto
- 25 maggio 2027
nuova gara probabile verso novembre 2026 - Offerte ricevute
- 14
- Procedura
- Procedura aperta
Qualsiasi impresa può presentare un'offerta. - Pubblicazione
- 21 gennaio 2026
- Lingua dell'avviso
- Inglese
Analisi IA: partecipare o no?
Riepilogo in italiano, criteri, documenti da fornire e verdetto GO / NO GO in un minuto.
Analisi illimitate durante i 14 giorni di prova Pro, senza carta.
Descrizione
Restrictive measures (sanctions) are an essential tool for the promotion of the objectives of the Common Foreign and Security Policy. Their objectives include safeguarding the Union’s values, maintaining international peace and security, consolidating and supporting democracy, the rule of law and human rights. The sanctions remain the main instrument in the Union’s toolbox to deter, prevent and condemn aggressive and illiberal behaviour of the third countries.
Considering that the lack of sanction implementation, as well as inconsistencies across different jurisdictions of the Union, also represent a risk to Union financial interests and to the national financial systems, it is important to make sure that the Union sanctions are implemented equally across the Union. This is particularly relevant for the implementation of the Union sanctions against Russia, which have been subsequently adopted starting from 2014. In order to curb circumvention of Union sanctions and assist the Member States in their sanction implementation tasks, this pilot project concerns a study on the best practices and synergies that would benefit the Union’s sanction policy, taking stock of the examples of the United States’ Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the United Kingdom sanctions enforcement authority (OFSI).
This would help to identify similarities, disparities, best practices and missing elements across all the jurisdictions of the Union. Considering that each Member State nominates a very different set and number of national authorities for the enforcement of Union sanctions (currently at least 160 officially designated), it would be useful to see to what extent having a centralised sanction implementation body would benefit Union sanction implementation, as compared to a network of scattered national bodies. Such a study would help to identify a way for reducing ‘avoidable’ sanction evasion, namely in terms of asset freeze and confiscation and visa and travel bans.
Aggiudicato a
Codici CPV
Codici europei che classificano l'oggetto dell'appalto. Grazie a loro troviamo gli appalti del Suo mestiere.
79311400 73200000 79000000 79300000 79311410
Prezzi vincenti di appalti comparabili
- Un quarto sotto
- 181.850 €
- Mediana
- 295.788 €
- Un quarto sopra
- 522.116 €
Importi IVA esclusa aggiudicati negli ultimi 3 anni per 84 appalti dello stesso gruppo CPV (7931…), esclusi gli accordi quadro. La metà degli appalti si colloca tra i due quartili. Fonte TED: soprattutto appalti sopra le soglie europee, quindi importi piuttosto elevati.
Appalti simili già aggiudicati
Source : TED – Office des publications de l'Union européenne © Union européenne, données retraitées. Riferimento 43276-2026.