Attribution Services
Comparative study on best practices for a stronger EU sanction enforcement
Avis publié en anglais. L'analyse IA vous le résume dans votre langue.
- Acheteur public
- European Commission, DG FISMA - Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union
Brussels - Lieu d'exécution
- 1000 Brussels
non publié : adresse de l'acheteur - Valeur estimée
- 500 000 € HTVA
- Montant attribué
- 427 948 € HTVA
- Fin prévue du contrat
- 25 mai 2027
relance probable vers novembre 2026 - Offres reçues
- 14
- Procédure
- Procédure ouverte
Toute entreprise peut remettre une offre. - Publication
- 21 janvier 2026
- Langue de l'avis
- Anglais
Analyse IA : y aller ou pas ?
Résumé en français, critères, documents à fournir et verdict GO / NO GO en une minute.
Analyses illimitées pendant les 14 jours d'essai Pro, sans carte.
Description
Restrictive measures (sanctions) are an essential tool for the promotion of the objectives of the Common Foreign and Security Policy. Their objectives include safeguarding the Union’s values, maintaining international peace and security, consolidating and supporting democracy, the rule of law and human rights. The sanctions remain the main instrument in the Union’s toolbox to deter, prevent and condemn aggressive and illiberal behaviour of the third countries.
Considering that the lack of sanction implementation, as well as inconsistencies across different jurisdictions of the Union, also represent a risk to Union financial interests and to the national financial systems, it is important to make sure that the Union sanctions are implemented equally across the Union. This is particularly relevant for the implementation of the Union sanctions against Russia, which have been subsequently adopted starting from 2014. In order to curb circumvention of Union sanctions and assist the Member States in their sanction implementation tasks, this pilot project concerns a study on the best practices and synergies that would benefit the Union’s sanction policy, taking stock of the examples of the United States’ Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the United Kingdom sanctions enforcement authority (OFSI).
This would help to identify similarities, disparities, best practices and missing elements across all the jurisdictions of the Union. Considering that each Member State nominates a very different set and number of national authorities for the enforcement of Union sanctions (currently at least 160 officially designated), it would be useful to see to what extent having a centralised sanction implementation body would benefit Union sanction implementation, as compared to a network of scattered national bodies. Such a study would help to identify a way for reducing ‘avoidable’ sanction evasion, namely in terms of asset freeze and confiscation and visa and travel bans.
Attribué à
Codes CPV
Codes européens qui classent l'objet du marché. C'est grâce à eux que nous retrouvons les marchés de votre métier.
79311400 73200000 79000000 79300000 79311410
Prix gagnants des marchés comparables
- Un quart sous
- 181 800 €
- Médiane
- 293 900 €
- Un quart au-dessus de
- 526 438 €
Montants HTVA attribués ces 3 dernières années pour 83 marchés du même groupe CPV (7931…), hors accords-cadres. La moitié des marchés se situe entre les deux quartiles. Source TED : surtout des marchés au-dessus des seuils européens, donc des montants plutôt élevés.
Marchés similaires déjà attribués
Source : TED – Office des publications de l'Union européenne © Union européenne, données retraitées. Référence 43276-2026.